Russell Brand & Team @ StayFree give us "The Clearest Proof Yet." (To exonerate President Trump)
This analysis exonerates President Donald Trump.
Note: All credits to quotes are given withing the video itself.
Russell Brand speaking:
“As the former Capitol Police Chief tells Tucker Carlson that multiple federal agents (Deep State) were in the crowd on Jan 6, but he wasn't informed of their presence, do any of his revelations exonerate Donald Trump, and could we be in the incredible scenario of Government agencies have prior knowledge of threats to the Capitol but letting it happen anyway?”
Russell Brand speaking:
“Is it possible that the Capitol Police were not inform of the potential threat, because that threat was beneficial to the establishment? Cui Bono? (Who benefits) by preventing the Chief of Capitol Police from knowing that there were threats that day? BUT HE WASN’T TOLD! otherwise, he would have handled it differently. HOW THEN CAN THIS BE BLAMED ON PRESIDENT TRUMP?”
Me: Why was Steven A Sund, the Chief of the Unites States Capitol Police, from 2019-2021, testimony NOT INCLUDED! in the ongoing enquire? WHY THE FUCK NOT!?
“Dozens of undercover agents and confidential human informants from multiple law enforcement agencies were present.”
[T]he FBI has a long history of using confidential informants to entrap people who otherwise would not have committed a crime.”
“At best, the riot was a massive security failure; at worst, informants may have encouraged rioters to enter the Capitol.”
“[After Jan 6] while establishment Democrats and commentators called for the many non-violent Jan 6 participants to be harshly prosecuted, even charged with “felony murder,”
“Some judges and prosecutors opted for leniency, acknowledging that “the actions of many of the individual rioters often boiled down to trespassing,”
“At least two FBI whistleblowers [have been] persecuted for concerns over how the Jan 6 protesters were treated. Friend (Steven’s friend) expressed concerns about the FBI’s use of SWAT teams to arrest Jan 6 subjects.”
“Within a month of these disclosures, the FBI removed Friend’s security clearance and removed him from active duty.”
“O’Boyle disclosed that the FBI pressure him to violate the law by opening domestic violent extremism investigations without sufficient basis.”
“O’Boyle was transferred to a new unit, moved his family across the country, and was placed in an unpaid suspension the first day he arrived.”
“While Sund was begging congressional leaders to greenlight assistance from the National Guard … who were “within eyesight” of the Capitol. …”
“[by] the time the National Guard finally showed up, Sund noted, “New Jersey State Police [had] beat them to the Capitol.”
“A Government Accountability Office report revealed that by Jan 3, 2021, the FBI was tracking four domestic terrorists who planned to attend the riot, Sund said.”
“Three days later, on the day of the riot, the number of domestic terrorists tracked by the FBI grew to “18 to 19”. "
“The actions, or lack thereof, taken by the government leading up to the riot led Sund to believe that intelligent officials in power were aware of the attack in advance and covered it up by failing to disseminate the information to those who needed it.”
“Lawmakers didn’t want Sund to testify.”
“In the aftermath of the Capitol riot, lawmakers began to schedule hearings on the security failures while the fever grew to launch a snap impeachment of the outgoing President.”
“I fought to testify,” Sund said, but “they didn’t want me to testify in the Senate hearing.”
“Donald Trump is facing four criminal charges relating to attempts to overturn the 2020 election result…with maximum sentences ranging from five to 20 years in prison.”
“The Capitol riot has frequently been compared to the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks. On the one, the comparison is absurd.”
“However, the two events have some stark parallels.”
“Each was an avoidable security failure, received a mountain of fear-inducing media coverage, and has since used to justify further centralization of repressive government powers.”
“The response to the events of Jan 6 has been marked by a crackdown on dissent: a dramatic increase to anti protest bills around the country, including at least 88 that have been introduced since the Capitol riot;”
“a massive buildup of the Capitol police into a national force to target “terrorism;” as well as the rollout by the Biden administration of a sweeping domestic counter-terror strategy.”
“In many ways the response to Jan 6 may wind up being more dangerous than the event itself.”
Russell Brand speaking:
“ So, if Steven Sund is telling the truth and he wasn’t given the vital intel that there could be violent insurrectionist in the crowd, who benefits from that event taking place, who benefits from the failure to call onsite law enforcement agencies and offices to the site, who benefits from Donald Trump being imprisoned from 5 to 20 years, who benefits from the introduction of a draft of anti-protest laws?
It seems to me that the current administration would benefit, opponents of Donald Trump would benefit, centralists, globalists, corporatist donor funded political organizations that do not change no matter who’s in power would all benefit.
When considering the framing of Jan 6, you have to ask yourself, how is this event being used, what’s happened subsequently, what do we know, what information is ignored, what information is amplified.
Steven Sund’s testimony on Tucker, that he was not given the information he needed to properly police the event and the fact that he was not allowed to testify, clearly points to an agenda, and the potential to impeach and even imprison Donald Trump suggests the beneficiary of those that most oppose him.”
Note: This platform doesn’t allow me to post Rumble videos and readers have to use YouTube to watch.